Global Crypto Licensing Overview
Cryptocurrency regulation is a rapidly changing landscape. Each country takes a different approach to balancing consumer protection and market innovation. Understanding a country’s stance on crypto is crucial for businesses and individuals considering operating within this innovative field. The following chart helps visualize how nations across the globe currently regulate (or don’t regulate) cryptocurrencies. It provides a snapshot of where countries fall on the regulatory spectrum.
| Jurisdiction names | Classification by attractiveness | Ease of license application procedure | Ease of access to banking and infrastructure setup | Initial set up fee | Annual (min) maintenance fees | Ongoing supervisory practice attitude | Tax Attractiveness | Local Presence | Application Time | Application Cost | Number of Licence Issued | Overall jurisdiction attractiveness for crypto projects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVG | PI | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 81 |
| St Lucia | PI | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 81 |
| Panama | NR | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 79 |
| Georgia | R | 6 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 74 |
| Lithuania | R | 9 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 71 |
| El Salvador | R | 8 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 66 |
| Canada | R | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 65 |
| Czech Republic | W | 10 | 5 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 63 |
| Poland | W | 10 | 5 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 62 |
| South Africa | PI | 8 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 61 |
| Brazil | PI | 8 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 59 |
| Portugal | R | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 59 |
| Cyprus | D | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 56 |
| Switzerland | R | 7 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 55 |
| Labuan | D | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 54 |
| Spain | W | 6 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 52 |
| UK | D | 5 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 52 |
| Kazakhstan | D | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 51 |
| Estonia | D | 4 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 50 |
| Cayman islands | R | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 49 |
| BVI | R | 7 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 49 |
| Gibraltar | D | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 48 |
| Singapore | D | 3 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 48 |
| Hong Kong | D | 3 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 48 |
| Australia | D | 6 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 47 |
| Bahrain | D | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 47 |
| UAE | D | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 44 |
| Germany | D | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 38 |
| USA | D | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 35 |
To interpret the chart, consider the following key:
- Not Regulated, but planning to introduce (NR): Cryptocurrencies are not subject to specific regulations, but there’s a clear intent to create a regulatory framework soon. This signals potential future hurdles and regulatory costs.
- Not regulated, but planning to introduce (PI): Cryptos function with few restrictions, though this comes with increased risks, low consumer trust, and potential challenges in accessing traditional finance.
- Weak Regulatory Regime (W): Basic crypto regulations exist, but there’s room for uncertainty and limited safeguards.
- Reasonable Regulatory Regime (R): Clear crypto guidelines are in place, promoting a balance of innovation and consumer protection. This category suggests a more stable environment for crypto-related activities.
- Complicated and Demanding Regulatory Regime (D): Countries here have strict and complex crypto rules. While offering strong oversight, this can stifle innovation and make compliance challenging.
Important Note: Cryptocurrency regulation is constantly evolving. The following chart serves as a snapshot and it’s essential to always check the most up-to-date regulations in any jurisdiction before proceeding with crypto-related activities.
To help individuals and businesses navigate the complex global landscape of cryptocurrency regulation, our team undertook in-depth research on promising crypto jurisdictions around the world. We carefully selected 29 jurisdictions exhibiting potential for crypto-friendly licensing environments.
We applied a 10-point evaluation framework to assess the attractiveness of each jurisdiction. These criteria provide a holistic perspective on the regulatory and business environment:
- Ease of License Application Procedure: We examine the overall accessibility of obtaining a cryptocurrency license, factoring in timelines, capital and local presence requirements, application fees, and documentation complexity.
- Ease of Access to Banking and Infrastructure Setup: The ability to establish banking relationships and access liquidity providers is crucial. We consider the availability of crypto-friendly payment institutions, banking infrastructure, and access to international banking channels.
- Initial Set-up Fee: We analyze the upfront costs of establishing a crypto-related business in each jurisdiction.
- Annual (Minimum) Maintenance Fees: Examines the ongoing costs and minimum fees required for maintaining operations.
- Ongoing Supervisory Practice Attitude: Evaluates the approach of regulatory bodies to supervision, measuring the frequency and complexity of reporting demands.
- Tax Attractiveness: Assessment of tax implications for crypto businesses and investors, including corporate rates, dividend taxes, and any incentives/deductions.
- Local Presence Requirements: Analyzes the need for physical offices and local staff for crypto licensing.
- Application Time: The expected timeframe for processing crypto license applications.
- Application Cost: Direct costs associated with the application process itself.
- Number of Current Licenses Issued: An indicator of market maturity and regulatory openness.
We use a 1-10 scale for each criterion (10 being the most favorable). This provides a detailed evaluation of each jurisdiction’s strengths and weaknesses.
By scoring these criteria, we assess the overall attractiveness of each jurisdiction for crypto businesses and investors. This analysis is a valuable tool for anyone navigating the ever-evolving landscape of crypto regulation.
The results displayed in the table below offer a nuanced understanding of each jurisdiction’s regulatory climate for cryptocurrencies.
Previous
Next
